Talk:Creative Commons license
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Creative Commons license article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was a Collaboration of the Week for WikiProject Open 20 October–27 October, 2013. |
Use-cases
[edit]"Left side indicates the use-cases allowed, right side the license components".
However, the article does not define what such use-cases are. JMGN (talk) 19:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Since version 4.0, derivative works are allowed but must not be shared
[edit]This seems to be contradictory to be the opposite of what is officialy stated
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. JMGN (talk) 20:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- That statement is for the 'ND' versions of the licence, but you've linked to the more permissive CC-BY-4.0. Specifically, all ND versions of the licence restrict the creation and distribution of derivatives, but CC-ND-4.0 et al permit derivatives for personal use so long as they are not distributed. Mindmatrix 23:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
V
[edit]English singer celebrity V-QY (talk) 22:37, 4 December 2024 (UTC)